Your Automated Pentest Looks Clean. See What It Missed in This Expert Webinar

Your pentest report looks clean. That might be the problem. Run automated pentesting long enough, and the new findings start to dry up. By the third or fourth run, fewer issues appear. The report looks stable. Leadership reads "stable" as "secure." It usually isn't. The work slows down. The risk does not. That gap is what a The Hacker News webinar with Picus Security sets out to close. Autumn

Report facts: The article warns that organizations over-relying on automated penetration testing often see findings taper off and misinterpret a series of 'clean' or 'stable' reports as meaning they are secure, even though real risk persists. It highlights a gap between what automated tools can detect and the evolving threat landscape, prompting a webinar with Picus Security focused on where automated testing falls short and how to close that gap.[1][9] CyberSE.AI analysis: For AI-enabled and agent-based systems, this same over-reliance on automation can mask high-impact issues such as unsafe tool use, poor guardrails, and missed business-logic flaws. Applying continuous AI-focused red teaming—specifically targeting agent behavior, chained tools, and real-world attack paths—helps uncover vulnerabilities that scripted or purely automated scans routinely miss and provides leadership with more realistic risk visibility.